Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs GeForce 705M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 705M with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.
Pro Vega 64X outperforms 705M by a whopping 2847% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1069 | 146 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.43 | 9.59 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GF119 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 19 March 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1468 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.800 | 375.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0912 TFLOPS | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 64 |
| TMUs | 8 | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP content protection | + | - |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2757%
|
200−210
+2757%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2757%
|
200−210
+2757%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2775%
|
230−240
+2775%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−2733%
|
170−180
+2733%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2757%
|
200−210
+2757%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−2800%
|
290−300
+2800%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2775%
|
230−240
+2775%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−2592%
|
350−400
+2592%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−2733%
|
170−180
+2733%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−2757%
|
200−210
+2757%
|
| World of Tanks | 24−27
−2785%
|
750−800
+2785%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2757%
|
200−210
+2757%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−2800%
|
290−300
+2800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2775%
|
230−240
+2775%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−2592%
|
350−400
+2592%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2757%
|
200−210
+2757%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 6−7
−2733%
|
170−180
+2733%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−2803%
|
900−950
+2803%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2733%
|
85−90
+2733%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−2733%
|
170−180
+2733%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−2733%
|
85−90
+2733%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.18 | 34.78 |
| Recency | 27 September 2013 | 19 March 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
GeForce 705M has 1566.7% lower power consumption.
Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has a 2847.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 705M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
