RTX A4500 Mobile vs GeForce 705M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 705M with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms 705M by a whopping 3539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1124 | 120 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.58 | 21.76 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GF119 | GA104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 (12 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 5888 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | 17,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.800 | 276.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0912 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 96 |
| TMUs | 8 | 184 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 184 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 46 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP content protection | + | - |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4600%
|
90−95
+4600%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4600%
|
90−95
+4600%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−5950%
|
120−130
+5950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6300%
|
120−130
+6300%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8500%
|
170−180
+8500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−2100%
|
150−160
+2100%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−12500%
|
120−130
+12500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1633%
|
150−160
+1633%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−622%
|
230−240
+622%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−969%
|
270−280
+969%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4600%
|
90−95
+4600%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−867%
|
140−150
+867%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−5950%
|
120−130
+5950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6300%
|
120−130
+6300%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8500%
|
170−180
+8500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−2100%
|
150−160
+2100%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−12500%
|
120−130
+12500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−9500%
|
95−100
+9500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1633%
|
150−160
+1633%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−2300%
|
140−150
+2300%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−622%
|
230−240
+622%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4600%
|
90−95
+4600%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−867%
|
140−150
+867%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−5950%
|
120−130
+5950%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6300%
|
120−130
+6300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−2100%
|
150−160
+2100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1633%
|
150−160
+1633%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−2300%
|
140−150
+2300%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−622%
|
230−240
+622%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8500%
|
170−180
+8500%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−2450%
|
100−110
+2450%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 7−8
−3914%
|
280−290
+3914%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1491%
|
170−180
+1491%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−26100%
|
260−270
+26100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 3−4
−3100%
|
95−100
+3100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−9600%
|
95−100
+9600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−3733%
|
110−120
+3733%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−5250%
|
100−110
+5250%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−529%
|
85−90
+529%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−3967%
|
240−250
+3967%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2550%
|
50−55
+2550%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 26100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX A4500 Mobile performs better in 43 tests (73%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (27%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.09 | 39.66 |
| Recency | 27 September 2013 | 22 March 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
GeForce 705M has 833.3% lower power consumption.
RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3538.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 705M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
