GeForce GT 630 OEM vs 705M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 705M with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 705M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.09

630 OEM outperforms 705M by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1124993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.582.46
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF119GK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 September 2013 (12 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48192
Core clock speed475 MHz875 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.80014.00
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 1.60
Recency 27 September 2013 24 April 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 705M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has a 46.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 705M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 705M
GeForce 705M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce 705M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 705M or GeForce GT 630 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.