UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce 7000M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7000M with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms 7000M by a whopping 10800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1493 | 751 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | no data | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
GPU code name | C67 | Rocket Lake Xe |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | shared Memory | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | -0−1 | 17 |
1440p | -0−1 | 15 |
4K | -0−1 | 10 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−200%
|
15
+200%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−167%
|
16
+167%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−140%
|
12
+140%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−650%
|
30−33
+650%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
World of Tanks | 8−9
−625%
|
55−60
+625%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−160%
|
13
+160%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−650%
|
30−33
+650%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−9900%
|
300−310
+9900%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 21−24 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+25%
|
12
−25%
|
Valorant | 0−1 | 3−4 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Fortnite | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 32
+0%
|
32
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 7000M is 25% faster.
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 650% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GeForce 7000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 26 tests (45%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (53%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.03 | 3.27 |
Recency | 1 February 2006 | 30 March 2021 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 10800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 7000M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.