UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs GeForce 7000M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7000M and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms 7000M by a whopping 20500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1496 | 559 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | no data | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
GPU code name | C67 | Alder Lake Xe |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 10 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | shared Memory | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | -0−1 | 21 |
1440p | -0−1 | 11 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 1−2
−2300%
|
24
+2300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18
+1700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1700%
|
18
+1700%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1400%
|
15
+1400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−317%
|
24−27
+317%
|
Valorant | 24−27
−204%
|
70−75
+204%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1200%
|
13
+1200%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−1111%
|
100−110
+1111%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
11
+1000%
|
Dota 2 | 8−9
−563%
|
53
+563%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−317%
|
24−27
+317%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−667%
|
23
+667%
|
Valorant | 24−27
−204%
|
70−75
+204%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
Dota 2 | 8−9
−513%
|
49
+513%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−317%
|
24−27
+317%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−267%
|
11
+267%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+9.1%
|
22
−9.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 35−40 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
Valorant | 1−2
−3300%
|
30−35
+3300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 7000M is 9% faster.
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 3300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GeForce 7000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is ahead in 25 tests (42%)
- there's a draw in 33 tests (56%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.03 | 6.18 |
Recency | 1 February 2006 | 4 January 2022 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 20500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.