Radeon 625 vs GeForce 7000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7000M and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 7000M
2006
0.03

625 outperforms 7000M by a whopping 9267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1485797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.88
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameC67Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (18 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3384
Core clock speed1 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 7000M 0.03
Radeon 625 2.81
+9267%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7000M 13
Radeon 625 1082
+8223%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
World of Tanks 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 20−22

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Valorant 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 0−1 3−4

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
World of Tanks 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 is ahead in 25 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.03 2.81
Recency 1 February 2006 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

Radeon 625 has a 9266.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 625 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 146 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.