TITAN RTX vs GeForce 6800 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6800 XT and TITAN RTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

6800 XT
2005
256 MB GDDR3
0.32

TITAN RTX outperforms 6800 XT by a whopping 15228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.08
Power efficiencyno data12.06
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV42TU102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 2005 (19 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed450 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors202 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt
Texture fill rate5.400509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs12288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

6800 XT 0.32
TITAN RTX 49.05
+15228%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

6800 XT 123
TITAN RTX 18858
+15232%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−16100%
162
+16100%
1440p0−1103
4K-0−173

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.43
1440pno data24.26
4Kno data34.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Elden Ring 182
+0%
182
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+0%
351
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 246
+0%
246
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Elden Ring 209
+0%
209
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 185
+0%
185
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 286
+0%
286
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 118
+0%
118
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+0%
248
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 171
+0%
171
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Dota 2 148
+0%
148
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 242
+0%
242
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 192
+0%
192
+0%
Valorant 236
+0%
236
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Elden Ring 130
+0%
130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+0%
114
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 192
+0%
192
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Elden Ring 70
+0%
70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 197
+0%
197
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 105
+0%
105
+0%

This is how 6800 XT and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 16100% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 49.05
Recency 30 September 2005 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 12 nm

TITAN RTX has a 15228.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6800 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT
GeForce 6800 XT
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 45 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 819 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.