Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6600 and Radeon RX 7900 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 6600
2004
256 MB DDR
0.22

RX 7900 XT outperforms 6600 by a whopping 34095% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.79
Power efficiencyno data17.30
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV43 A2Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 August 2004 (20 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5376
Core clock speed300 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2394 MHz
Number of transistors146 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400804.4
Floating-point processing powerno data51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 6600 0.22
RX 7900 XT 75.23
+34095%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 6600 86
RX 7900 XT 28929
+33538%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1205
1440p-0−1134
4K-0−188

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.39
1440pno data6.71
4Kno data10.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 237
+0%
237
+0%
Elden Ring 230
+0%
230
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190
+0%
190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 580
+0%
580
+0%
Metro Exodus 163
+0%
163
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 186
+0%
186
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Elden Ring 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 492
+0%
492
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 161
+0%
161
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 168
+0%
168
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 184
+0%
184
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 424
+0%
424
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Elden Ring 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+0%
159
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 325
+0%
325
+0%
Metro Exodus 141
+0%
141
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 175
+0%
175
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 175
+0%
175
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 75.23
Recency 12 August 2004 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 XT has a 34095.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6600
GeForce 6600
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 279 votes

Rate GeForce 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1844 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.