Radeon R7 Graphics vs GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV44 B2Spectre
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 December 2004 (21 years ago)11 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed350 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data836 MHz
Number of transistors75 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40023.04
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2004 11 January 2014
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm

R7 Graphics has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 TurboCache and Radeon R7 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1841 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 TurboCache or Radeon R7 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.