Radeon 625 vs GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Place in the ranking	1427	798
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	3.87
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	NV44 B2	Polaris 24
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 December 2004 (20 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	384
Core clock speed	350 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	75 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	110 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.400	24.58
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	8
TMUs	4	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	165 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	250 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	4 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	3.0	6.3
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

6200 TurboCache 0.14

Radeon 625 2.81
+1907%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

6200 TurboCache 53

Radeon 625 1082
+1942%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Elden Ring	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Elden Ring	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Fortnite	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
World of Tanks	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
World of Tanks	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.14	2.81
Recency	15 December 2004	13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	110 nm	28 nm

Radeon 625 has a 1907.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 625 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 TurboCache in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 TurboCache is a desktop card while Radeon 625 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.