RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6200 TurboCache with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.


6200 TurboCache
2004
64 MB DDR
0.12

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms 6200 TurboCache by a whopping 41767% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data55.27
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV44 B2AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 December 2004 (21 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed350 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors75 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate1.400299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length165 mm168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

6200 TurboCache 0.12
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 50.24
+41767%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

6200 TurboCache 51
Samples: 258
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20577
+40247%
Samples: 200

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 50.24
Recency 15 December 2004 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 41767% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 TurboCache in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 TurboCache is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 60 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 TurboCache or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.