Tesla M6 vs GeForce 615

Place in the ranking	1088	386
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.90	11.43
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	GF108	GM204
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 May 2012 (13 years ago)	30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	1536
Core clock speed	660 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1180 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.280	113.3
Floating-point processing power	0.1267 TFLOPS	3.625 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	8	96
L1 Cache	64 KB	576 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.1	5.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 615 1.21

Tesla M6 14.87
+1129%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 615 505
Samples: 37

Tesla M6 6224
+1132%

Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.21	14.87
Recency	15 May 2012	30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	100 Watt

GeForce 615 has 104.1% lower power consumption.

Tesla M6, on the other hand, has a 1128.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla M6 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 615 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 615 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M6 is a workstation one.