ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530 vs GeForce 610M

Place in the ranking	1158	1289
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.37	no data
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	GF119	M92
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2011 (13 years ago)	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	80
Core clock speed	738 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	292 million	242 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	5.904	4.000
Floating-point processing power	0.1417 TFLOPS	0.08 TFLOPS
Video decoders	H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p	no data
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 14.4 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.76
+111%

ATI Mobility HD 4530 0.36

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 610M 2210
+212%

ATI Mobility HD 4530 708

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Fortnite	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
World of Tanks	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
World of Tanks	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 610M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce 610M is ahead in 21 test (66%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.76	0.36
Recency	1 December 2011	9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	55 nm

GeForce 610M has a 111.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4530 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.