Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce 6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6100 and Radeon RX 6650 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 6100
2004
0.07

RX 6650 XT outperforms 6100 by a whopping 62071% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.71
Power efficiencyno data17.46
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameC51Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2004 (20 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed425 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data176 Watt
Texture fill rate0.43337.3
Floating-point processing powerno data10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2190 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 6100 0.07
RX 6650 XT 43.52
+62071%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 6100 27
RX 6650 XT 17184
+63544%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1140
1440p-0−166
4K-0−136

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.85
1440pno data6.05
4Kno data11.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 273
+0%
273
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 136
+0%
136
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 193
+0%
193
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
World of Tanks 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 124
+0%
124
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.07 43.52
Recency 11 October 2004 10 May 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm

RX 6650 XT has a 62071.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6100
GeForce 6100
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate GeForce 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3526 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.