RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs GeForce 410M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 410M with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 410M
2011
Up to 512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.61

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms 410M by a whopping 15411% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.92
Power efficiency4.1112.77
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGF119GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4824064
Core clock speed575 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors292 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate4.6001,968
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4192
TMUs8752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cache64 KB23.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL+4.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 410M 0.61
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 94.62
+15411%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 410M 271
Samples: 489
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 42222
+15480%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−14900%
1200−1250
+14900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−14900%
1200−1250
+14900%
Valorant 27−30
−15257%
4300−4350
+15257%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−15163%
2900−2950
+15163%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 12−14
−15317%
1850−1900
+15317%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−14900%
1200−1250
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 27−30
−15257%
4300−4350
+15257%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 12−14
−15317%
1850−1900
+15317%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−14900%
1200−1250
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 27−30
−15257%
4300−4350
+15257%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−14900%
900−950
+14900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−15257%
2150−2200
+15257%
Valorant 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

This is how GeForce 410M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 14900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 94.62
Recency 5 January 2011 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 600 Watt

GeForce 410M has 4900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 15411.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 410M is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GeForce 410M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 327 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 57 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 410M or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.