Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce 410M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 410M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 410M
2011
Up to 512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.61

Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms 410M by a whopping 674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1236667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.1115.28
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGF119Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)28 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864
Core clock speed575 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL+no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 410M 0.61
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4.72
+674%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 410M 415
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187
+909%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 410M 1923
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442
+651%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−125%
18
+125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
11
+120%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Valorant 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−105%
39
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 12−14
−150%
30
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−200%
18
+200%
Valorant 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 12−14
−133%
28
+133%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 15
+0%
15
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1

This is how GeForce 410M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 125% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) performs better in 36 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 4.72
Recency 5 January 2011 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 673.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GeForce 410M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 326 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 243 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 410M or Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.