RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce 320M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1314not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.51no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC89AD103
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores489728
Core clock speed450 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors486 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200510.7
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce 320M has 421.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 68 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.