GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameC89G71M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)12 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864
Core clock speed450 MHz16 MHz
Boost clock speedno data575 MHz
Number of transistors486 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2x512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)GDDR3
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 12 October 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 90 Watt

GeForce 320M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 291.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.