GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1286not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameC89GK106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48960
Core clock speed450 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors486 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20087.84
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs824
TMUs1680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 320M has 552.2% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 158 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.