GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameC89G80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48112
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors486 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20028.00
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs1628
L2 Cacheno data80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared640 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 19 November 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 320M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 552.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.