Arc 7 A780 vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1317not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.51no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameC89DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (16 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484096
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors486 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200563.2
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared17.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data559.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 200 Watt

GeForce 320M has 770% lower power consumption.

Arc 7 A780, on the other hand, has a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and Arc 7 A780. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while Arc 7 A780 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 68 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 42 votes

Rate Arc 7 A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or Arc 7 A780, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.