Tesla D870 vs GeForce 315M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1398not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.48no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218G80
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)2 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16128 ×2
Core clock speed606 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors260 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt520 Watt
Texture fill rate4.84838.40 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.03878 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS ×2
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs424 ×2
TMUs832 ×2
L2 Cache32 KB96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB1536 MB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL4.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 2 May 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 520 Watt

GeForce 315M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 3614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 315M and Tesla D870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 315M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla D870 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GeForce 315M
NVIDIA Tesla D870
Tesla D870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 172 votes

Rate GeForce 315M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla D870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 315M or Tesla D870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.