UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce 310M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
305M 310M 315M 405M G105M G210M ION 2
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 310M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 310M
2010
Up to 1 GB DDR3, 14 Watt
0.31

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms 310M by a whopping 635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GeForce 310M GeForce 310M
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1329863
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5215.67
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGT218Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2010 (15 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1624
Core clock speed606 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848no data
Floating-point processing power0.04896 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHzno data
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−231%
40−45
+231%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−70%
17
+70%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−100%
8
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 4−5

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GeForce 310M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 1200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is ahead in 31 test (56%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.31 2.28
Recency 10 January 2010 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 635.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 310M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GeForce 310M
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 310M GeForce 310M
vs
GT 220M GeForce GT 220M
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GeForce 310M GeForce 310M
vs
GeForce 315M GeForce 315M
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce4 Go 4200 GeForce4 Go 4200
vs
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
RX Vega Mobile Radeon RX Vega Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
ATI 3000 IGP Radeon 3000 IGP
vs
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
ATI M7740 FirePro M7740
7500 LE GeForce 7500 LE
vs
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 459 votes

Rate GeForce 310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 310M or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.