A100X vs GeForce 310M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1386 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.64 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GT218 | GA100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 January 2010 (16 years ago) | 28 June 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 6912 |
| Core clock speed | 606 MHz | 795 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1440 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 260 million | 54,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.848 | 622.1 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.04896 TFLOPS | 19.91 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 73 | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 160 |
| TMUs | 8 | 432 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 432 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 20.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | 80 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2e |
| Maximum RAM amount | Up to 1 GB | 80 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 5120 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz | 1593 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s | 2,039 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 8.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2010 | 28 June 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 300 Watt |
GeForce 310M has 2042.9% lower power consumption.
A100X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 310M and A100X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 310M is a notebook graphics card while A100X is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
