ATI FirePro V9800 vs GeForce 305M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1342not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.98no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT218Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161600
Core clock speed525 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors260 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20068.00
Floating-point processing power0.0368 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
Gigaflops55no data
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache32 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 700 (DDR3), Up to 700 (GDDR3) MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 9 September 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 305M has 1686% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 305M and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 305M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 305M or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.