UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce 3 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.20
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameno dataRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2002 (23 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors27 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 / 64 / 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2002 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 3 Go has 650% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 3 Go and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 3 Go is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 3 Go
GeForce 3 Go
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce 3 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 428 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 3 Go or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.