TITAN RTX vs GeForce 256 SDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated95
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.30
Power efficiencyno data12.39
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV10TU102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 1999 (26 years ago)18 December 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed120 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors17 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt
Texture fill rate0.48509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 1999 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 220 nm 12 nm

TITAN RTX has an age advantage of 19 years, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 256 SDR and TITAN RTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
GeForce 256 SDR
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 134 votes

Rate GeForce 256 SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 874 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 256 SDR or TITAN RTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.