RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 256 DDR

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated84
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.18
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV10 A3AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date23 December 1999 (25 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed120 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors17 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.48247.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed150 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 December 1999 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 220 nm 5 nm

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 256 DDR and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 256 DDR
GeForce 256 DDR
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 276 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 43 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 256 DDR or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.