Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce 210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
205 OEM 210 210 OEM 210 PCI 210 Rev. 2 256 DDR 256 SDR
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 5300M Pro 5500M Pro 5600M Pro W5300M Pro W5500M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 210 with Radeon Pro 5500M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 210
2009, $29
512 MB GDDR2, 30 Watt
0.33

Pro 5500M outperforms 210 by a whopping 4715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
Pro 5500M Pro 5500M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8314.55
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT218SNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161536
Core clock speed589 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors260 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Watt85 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.160139.2
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs896
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 210 0.33
Pro 5500M 15.89
+4715%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 210 138
Samples: 6949
Pro 5500M 6732
+4778%
Samples: 244

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
1440p1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
4K0−132

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.49no data
1440p29.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 208
+0%
208
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 118
+0%
118
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 107
+0%
107
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 71
+0%
71
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how GeForce 210 and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5500M is 5600% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5500M is 5800% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.33 15.89
Recency 12 October 2009 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 85 Watt

GeForce 210 has 183.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500M, on the other hand, has a 4715.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
vs
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
HD 6350 Radeon HD 6350
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI HD 4750 Radeon HD 4750
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI X1650 XT Radeon X1650 XT
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI X1300 Radeon X1300
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI X800 XT Mac Edition Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
vs
Go 7300T GeForce Go 7300T
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
vs
H200 NVL H200 NVL
GT 220 OEM GeForce GT 220 OEM
vs
P102-100 P102 100
GT 220 OEM GeForce GT 220 OEM
vs
RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3993 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 303 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or Radeon Pro 5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.