Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce 210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
205 OEM 210 210 OEM 210 PCI 210 Rev. 2 256 DDR 256 SDR
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 210 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 210
2009, $29
512 MB GDDR2, 30 Watt
0.33

7-Cores iGPU outperforms 210 by a whopping 4585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1361376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.82no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGT218SMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores167
Core clock speed589 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.160no data
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−134

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.33 15.46
Recency 12 October 2009 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 4584.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop graphics card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI HD 5450 Radeon HD 5450
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ION ION
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
vs
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
vs
Tesla K40t Tesla K40t
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
GT 230 GeForce GT 230
vs
9650M GT GeForce 9650M GT
GT 230 GeForce GT 230
vs
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3987 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 109 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.