Radeon Vega 7 vs GRID M60-1Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M6-8Q M60-1Q M60-2Q M60-4A M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 320SP Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile Vega 7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M60-1Q with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

GRID M60-1Q
2015
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
8.83
+31.6%

M60-1Q outperforms Vega 7 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
Vega 7 Vega 7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking525600
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Power efficiency3.0111.45
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204Cezanne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048448
Core clock speed557 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate150.853.20
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs12828
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
+22.7%
22
−22.7%
1440p35−40
+25%
28
−25%
4K21−24
+16.7%
18
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GRID M60-1Q and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • GRID M60-1Q is 23% faster in 1080p
  • GRID M60-1Q is 25% faster in 1440p
  • GRID M60-1Q is 17% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.83 6.71
Recency 30 August 2015 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 45 Watt

GRID M60-1Q has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GRID M60-1Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M60-1Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
GRID M60-1Q
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
P104-100 P104 100
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
Arc A550M Arc A550M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
A2 A2
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 8 GB
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
vs
Quadro P3200 P3200
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 2 votes

Rate GRID M60-1Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3163 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M60-1Q or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.