T600 vs GRID M40

Place in the ranking	748	383
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.10	29.32
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 May 2016 (9 years ago)	6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	640
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	33.06	53.40
Floating-point processing power	0.7933 TFLOPS	1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	40
L1 Cache	192 KB	640 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1300 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.0	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −286%	54 +286%
1440p	5−6 −360%	23 +360%
4K	5−6 −300%	20 +300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	46 +0%	46 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	121 +0%	121 +0%
Far Cry 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	59 +0%	59 +0%
Metro Exodus	26 +0%	26 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	48 +0%	48 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	111 +0%	111 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 +0%	27 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

85−90

+0%

85−90

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	27 +0%	27 +0%
Metro Exodus	15 +0%	15 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	25 +0%	25 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +0%	16 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

This is how GRID M40 and T600 compete in popular games:

T600 is 286% faster in 1080p
T600 is 360% faster in 1440p
T600 is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.96	15.23
Recency	18 May 2016	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt

GRID M40 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600, on the other hand, has a 285% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.