Radeon 760M vs GRID M40

Place in the ranking	741	420
Place by popularity	not in top-100	93
Power efficiency	6.07	66.65
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code name	GM107	Phoenix
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2016 (9 years ago)	31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	512
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	2599 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	33.06	83.17
Floating-point processing power	0.7933 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8
L0 Cache	no data	128 KB
L1 Cache	192 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1300 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Motherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −263%	29 +263%
1440p	5−6 −260%	18 +260%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	105 +0%	105 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +0%	30 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	77 +0%	77 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	38 +0%	38 +0%
Fortnite	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	33 +0%	33 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Dota 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	35 +0%	35 +0%
Fortnite	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	36 +0%	36 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 +0%	38 +0%
Valorant	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Dota 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	33 +0%	33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 +0%	23 +0%
Valorant	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

75−80

+0%

75−80

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	16 +0%	16 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

This is how GRID M40 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

Radeon 760M is 263% faster in 1080p
Radeon 760M is 260% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.94	12.97
Recency	18 May 2016	31 January 2024
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 229.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.