GeForce GT 650M vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GTX 660M GTX 660M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M40 with GeForce GT 650M, including specs and performance data.

GRID M40
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.98
+40.1%

GRID M40 outperforms GT 650M by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M40 GRID M40
GT 650M GT 650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722812
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.074.82
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GK107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1033 MHzUp to 900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate33.0630.40
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sUp to 80.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+29%
31
−29%
Full HD40−45
+25%
32
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 72
+0%
72
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
God of War 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
God of War 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GRID M40 and GT 650M compete in popular games:

  • GRID M40 is 29% faster in 900p
  • GRID M40 is 25% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.98 2.84
Recency 18 May 2016 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

GRID M40 has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 650M, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The GRID M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 650M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GeForce GT 650M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
vs
HD 7750M Radeon HD 7750M
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 750 Ti OEM
RTX 3050 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 750 Ti OEM
T400 4 GB NVIDIA T400 4 GB
vs
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
T400 4 GB NVIDIA T400 4 GB
vs
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
RTX A400 NVIDIA RTX A400
vs
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
H100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB
vs
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
GTX 1070 GDDR5X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
vs
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
RX 590 GME AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
vs
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
RTX 5000 RTX 5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 485 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or GeForce GT 650M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.