UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GRID M10-8Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M10-8Q with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

GRID M10-8Q
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.20
+57%

M10-8Q outperforms Graphics 750 32EUs by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking622744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.12no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGM107Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed1033 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.24no data
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1300 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+50%
16
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GRID M10-8Q and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • GRID M10-8Q is 50% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.20 3.95
Recency 18 May 2016 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GRID M10-8Q has a 57% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M10-8Q is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M10-8Q is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
GRID M10-8Q
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
FirePro R5000 FirePro R5000
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 3060 8 GB GA104
vs
RX Vega Mobile Vega Mobile
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Xe Graphics G1
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
A100 PCIe PCIe
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G1 Xe G1
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs G7 80EUs
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
A100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
RTX 4090 D 4090 D
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile 3080 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M10-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M10-8Q or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.