Xbox Series X GPU vs GRID K560Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK104Scarlett
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363328
Core clock speed745 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36379.6
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS12.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mm301 mm
Width2-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 10 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt

Xbox Series X GPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K560Q and Xbox Series X GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K560Q is a workstation graphics card while Xbox Series X GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K560Q
GRID K560Q
AMD Xbox Series X GPU
Xbox Series X GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K560Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1233 votes

Rate Xbox Series X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.