ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs GRID K520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K240Q K260Q K280Q K500 K520 Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
550v 560v 565v 4650 4670 4670 Mac Edition 5165

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K520 with Mobility Radeon HD 4670, including specs and performance data.

GRID K520
2013, $3,599
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
8.41
+658%

K520 outperforms Mobility HD 4670 by a whopping 658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K520 GRID K520
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5441124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.872.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK104M96
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)9 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2320
Core clock speed745 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×221.60
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×20.432 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×28
TMUs128 ×232
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×225.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.41 1.11
Recency 23 July 2013 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 35 Watt

GRID K520 has a 657.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 4670, on the other hand, has 542.9% lower power consumption.

The GRID K520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K520 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K520
GRID K520
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility Radeon HD 4670
vs
8800M GTX GeForce 8800M GTX
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell PRO 6000 Blackwell
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
GTX 850M GTX 850M
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
R6 M255DX R6 M255DX
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
HD 6950M HD 6950M
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
9800M GT GeForce 9800M GT
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
ATI Mobility HD 560v Radeon HD 560v
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Radeon HD 4650
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3650 Radeon HD 3650
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
R9 370X R9 370X
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
R9 270 1024SP R9 270 1024SP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 3 votes

Rate GRID K520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K520 or Mobility Radeon HD 4670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.