Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GRID K340

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K340 with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

GRID K340
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
3.09

RX 7800 XT outperforms GRID K340 by a whopping 1934% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking77433
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0567.99
Power efficiency0.9416.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7800 XT has 135880% better value for money than GRID K340.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×43840
Core clock speed950 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×4583.2
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×437.32 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×496
TMUs32 ×4240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×416 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×4256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×4624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−2060%
216
+2060%
1440p6−7
−1967%
124
+1967%
4K3−4
−2267%
71
+2267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p329.90
−14180%
2.31
+14180%
1440p549.83
−13563%
4.02
+13563%
4K1099.67
−15547%
7.03
+15547%
  • RX 7800 XT has 14180% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT has 13563% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT has 15547% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 324
+0%
324
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 241
+0%
241
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 248
+0%
248
+0%
Atomic Heart 243
+0%
243
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200
+0%
200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+0%
196
+0%
Far Cry 5 204
+0%
204
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 278
+0%
278
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 276
+0%
276
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Atomic Heart 145
+0%
145
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 163
+0%
163
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 261
+0%
261
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 256
+0%
256
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 172
+0%
172
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 366
+0%
366
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 149
+0%
149
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150
+0%
150
+0%
Far Cry 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
+0%
200
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Atomic Heart 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+0%
164
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GRID K340 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 2060% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 1967% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 2267% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 62.84
Recency 23 July 2013 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 263 Watt

GRID K340 has 16.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 1933.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K340 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1
1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
3389 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or Radeon RX 7800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.