Radeon HD 8610G vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K340 with Radeon HD 8610G, including specs and performance data.

GRID K340
2013, $3,299
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.89
+201%

K340 outperforms HD 8610G by a whopping 201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K340 GRID K340
HD 8610G HD 8610G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8221168
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGK107Richland
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)23 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×4384
Core clock speed950 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speedno data626 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.40 ×4no data
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs8 ×4no data
TMUs32 ×4no data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×4no data
Memory bus width64 Bit ×4no data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+169%
13
−169%

Cost per frame, $

1080p94.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GRID K340 and HD 8610G compete in popular games:

  • GRID K340 is 169% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.89 0.96
Recency 23 July 2013 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

GRID K340 has a 201% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID K340 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8610G in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8610G is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
Radeon HD 8610G
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
HD 8610G Radeon HD 8610G
vs
R2 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
vs
A10M A10M
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
vs
GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-8
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
HD 8450G HD 8450G
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
HD 8410G HD 8410G
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
HD 8350G HD 8350G
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
HD 8310G HD 8310G
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
HD 8250 HD 8250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 31 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8610G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or Radeon HD 8610G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.