FirePro M2000 vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3100 M3900 M4000 M4100 M4150 M4170 M5100 M5950 M6000 M6100 M8900

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K340 with FirePro M2000, including specs and performance data.

GRID K340
2013, $3,299
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.89
+183%

K340 outperforms M2000 by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K340 GRID K340
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8211150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.992.38
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK107Turks
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)1 July 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×4480
Core clock speed950 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×412.00
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×40.48 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×48
TMUs32 ×424
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno datachip-down
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×41 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×464 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×425.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27
+167%
9
−167%
Full HD45−50
+181%
16
−181%

Cost per frame, $

1080p73.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GRID K340 and FirePro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • GRID K340 is 167% faster in 900p
  • GRID K340 is 181% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.89 1.02
Recency 23 July 2013 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 33 Watt

GRID K340 has a 183.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M2000, on the other hand, has 581.8% lower power consumption.

The GRID K340 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
FX 2800M Quadro FX 2800M
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
Tesla K40st Tesla K40st
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FirePro M3900 FirePro M3900
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
FirePro M3100 FirePro M3100
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 965M 4 GB
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
GTS 150 OEM GTS 150 OEM
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
8800 GT Mac Edition GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or FirePro M2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.