ATI Radeon 9700 PRO vs GRID K280Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K280Q with Radeon 9700 PRO, including specs and performance data.

GRID K280Q
2013, $1,875
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.79
+5123%

K280Q outperforms 9700 PRO by a whopping 5123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6001498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency2.32no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGK104R300
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,875 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.362.600
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs1288
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s19.84 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K280Q 6.79
+5123%
ATI 9700 PRO 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K280Q 2839
+5257%
Samples: 30
ATI 9700 PRO 53
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.79 0.13
Recency 28 June 2013 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GRID K280Q has a 5123% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID K280Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9700 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K280Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K280Q or Radeon 9700 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.