RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K260Q and RTX 4000 Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID K260Q
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
7.05

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms K260Q by a whopping 714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency2.4033.89
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15366144
Core clock speed745 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36417.6
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache128 KB6 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K260Q 7.05
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 57.42
+714%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K260Q 2949
Samples: 4
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24027
+715%
Samples: 674

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.05 57.42
Recency 28 June 2013 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 714.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 73.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K260Q in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K260Q or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.