L40 vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K260Q and L40, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID K260Q
2013, $937
2 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
7.05

L40 outperforms K260Q by a whopping 662% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency2.4113.77
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)13 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153618176
Core clock speed745 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2490 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate95.361,414
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS90.52 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs128568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142
L1 Cache128 KB17.8 MB
L2 Cache512 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K260Q 7.05
L40 53.69
+662%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K260Q 2949
Samples: 4
L40 22466
+662%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.05 53.69
Recency 28 June 2013 13 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 300 Watt

GRID K260Q has 33.3% lower power consumption.

L40, on the other hand, has a 661.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The L40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K260Q in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
NVIDIA L40
L40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 29 votes

Rate L40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K260Q or L40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.