GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs GRID K260Q

GRID K2 GRID K260Q GRID K520 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Tesla K10
VS
RTX 4080 Max-Q RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q RTX 4080 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K260Q with GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GRID K260Q
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
7.65

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms GRID K260Q by a whopping 752% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.93no data
Power efficiency2.3340.59
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15367424
Core clock speed745 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36386.3
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs128232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GRID K260Q 7.65
RTX 4080 Mobile 65.19
+752%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K260Q 2949
RTX 4080 Mobile 25116
+752%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−772%
157
+772%
1440p12−14
−767%
104
+767%
4K8−9
−775%
70
+775%

Cost per frame, $

1080p52.06no data
1440p78.08no data
4K117.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 149
+0%
149
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
+0%
143
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 351
+0%
351
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
+0%
118
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 318
+0%
318
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 172
+0%
172
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110
+0%
110
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 93
+0%
93
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 237
+0%
237
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+0%
140
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 211
+0%
211
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+0%
55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
+0%
121
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how GRID K260Q and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 772% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 767% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 775% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.65 65.19
Recency 28 June 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 110 Watt

RTX 4080 Mobile has a 752.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 104.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K260Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K260Q is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RTX 4080 Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
GRID K1 GRID K1
vs
P104-100 P104 100
GRID K1 GRID K1
vs
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10 8Q
NVS 315 NVS 315
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 628 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.