Arc A750 vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K260Q with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

GRID K260Q
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
7.64

Arc A750 outperforms GRID K260Q by a whopping 474% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking49673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.76
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code nameGK104DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 $289
Current priceno data$625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363584
Core clock speed745 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36537.6
Floating-point performance2,289 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GRID K260Q 7.64
Arc A750 43.83
+474%

Arc A750 outperforms GRID K260Q by 474% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GRID K260Q 2949
Arc A750 11956
+305%

Arc A750 outperforms GRID K260Q by 305% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−538%
102
+538%
1440p10−12
−510%
61
+510%
4K6−7
−517%
37
+517%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−520%
62
+520%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−543%
90
+543%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−475%
90−95
+475%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−494%
100−110
+494%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−522%
112
+522%
Hitman 3 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−550%
195
+550%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−500%
144
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−538%
100−110
+538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−533%
285
+533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−500%
96
+500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−533%
76
+533%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−475%
90−95
+475%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−494%
100−110
+494%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−493%
160−170
+493%
Hitman 3 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−497%
170−180
+497%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−505%
127
+505%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−538%
100−110
+538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−498%
239
+498%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−517%
185
+517%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−478%
100−110
+478%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45
+543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−475%
69
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−475%
90−95
+475%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−543%
90
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−528%
113
+528%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−563%
199
+563%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−475%
69
+475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−530%
63
+530%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−538%
100−110
+538%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−514%
85−90
+514%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−510%
128
+510%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−533%
38
+533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−500%
54
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−533%
76
+533%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−558%
79
+558%
Hitman 3 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−475%
92
+475%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−514%
86
+514%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−504%
145
+504%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−533%
57
+533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−525%
50
+525%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−533%
75−80
+533%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−533%
35−40
+533%
Hitman 3 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−533%
55−60
+533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−529%
44
+529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−475%
69
+475%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−600%
28
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−500%
30
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−510%
61
+510%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−480%
58
+480%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−478%
52
+478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−500%
30
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

This is how GRID K260Q and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 538% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 510% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 517% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.64 43.83
Recency 28 June 2013 12 October 2022
Cost $937 $289
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K260Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K260Q is a workstation graphics card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 695 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.