ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs GRID K240Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking636not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Power efficiency2.08no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK104RS880
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)10 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153640
Core clock speed745 MHz498 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.361.992
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS0.03984 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1284
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 10 September 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

GRID K240Q has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K240Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K240Q is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 64 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K240Q or Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.