GeForce RTX 4080 vs GRID K160Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4010 4060 4060 AD106 4060 Ti 4060 Ti 16 GB 4060 Ti AD104 4070 4070 AD103 4070 GDDR6 4070 SUPER 4070 Ti 4070 Ti SUPER 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 4080 4080 SUPER 4090 4090 D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K160Q with GeForce RTX 4080, including specs and performance data.

GRID K160Q
2013, $125
1 GB DDR3, 130 Watt
1.49

RTX 4080 outperforms K160Q by a whopping 5402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
RTX 4080 RTX 4080

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10157
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1338.60
Power efficiency0.8819.75
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107AD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)20 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4080 has 29592% better value for money than GRID K160Q.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1929728
Core clock speed850 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60761.5
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache16 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K160Q 1.49
RTX 4080 81.98
+5402%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K160Q 628
Samples: 7
RTX 4080 34449
+5386%
Samples: 9516

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−5575%
227
+5575%
1440p2−3
−7750%
157
+7750%
4K1−2
−10200%
103
+10200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p31.25
−492%
5.28
+492%
1440p62.50
−718%
7.64
+718%
4K125.00
−974%
11.64
+974%
  • RTX 4080 has 492% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 has 718% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 has 974% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 231
+0%
231
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 320
+0%
320
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 231
+0%
231
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 223
+0%
223
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 249
+0%
249
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 550−600
+0%
550−600
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 210
+0%
210
+0%
Dota 2 249
+0%
249
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 218
+0%
218
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 239
+0%
239
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 213
+0%
213
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 545
+0%
545
+0%
Valorant 550−600
+0%
550−600
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190
+0%
190
+0%
Dota 2 233
+0%
233
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 204
+0%
204
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 258
+0%
258
+0%
Valorant 575
+0%
575
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 259
+0%
259
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 154
+0%
154
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 201
+0%
201
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+0%
191
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 185
+0%
185
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 187
+0%
187
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 227
+0%
227
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GRID K160Q and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 5575% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 7750% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 10200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.49 81.98
Recency 28 June 2013 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 320 Watt

GRID K160Q has 146.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 5402% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K160Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K160Q is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K160Q
GRID K160Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
GRID K1 GRID K1
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
vs
RTX 4080 SUPER GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
vs
Ice Lake GT3e Ice Lake GT3e
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
vs
UHD Graphics 910 UHD Graphics 910
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
vs
UHD Graphics 920 UHD Graphics 920
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
vs
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K160Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5340 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K160Q or GeForce RTX 4080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.