GeForce RTX 5080 vs GRID K140Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking909not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK107GB203
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)2025
Launch price (MSRP)$125 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19210752
Core clock speed850 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60846.7
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS54.19 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs16336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.09.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 350 Watt

GRID K140Q has 169.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GRID K140Q and GeForce RTX 5080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K140Q is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K140Q
GRID K140Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GeForce RTX 5080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K140Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 58 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.