ATI Radeon 8500 vs GRID K100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1563
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK107R200
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed850 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate13.602.200
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs168
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 23 Watt

GRID K100 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 8500, on the other hand, has 465.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K100 and Radeon 8500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K100
GRID K100
ATI Radeon 8500
Radeon 8500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 108 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K100 or Radeon 8500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.