Radeon RX 6700 vs GMA X4500HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated90
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.87
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameEaglelakeNavi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)9 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed533 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate2.132352.8
Floating-point processing powerno data11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 9 June 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 175 Watt

GMA X4500HD has 1246.2% lower power consumption.

RX 6700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500HD and Radeon RX 6700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500HD
GMA X4500HD
AMD Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 17 votes

Rate GMA X4500HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1558 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X4500HD or Radeon RX 6700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.